>> Do you want to help me with my research? << Consult my want list
here !
Please note that words with an asterisk (*) are defined at the bottom of this page! Only first appearances are marked.
The whereabouts of L. Ron Hubbard (page 3)
This particular study aims to give an overview of the various thoughts and theories that go around in regards to the whereabouts of L. Ron Hubbard. The years 1972, 1977 and 1982 are the one's that often are named in relation to that someone other than L. Ron Hubbard had taken control over the subject of Scientology. The focus is put on the published sources and the things they relate, and to follow the tech line.
The main focus has been put on from which time on basic tech may have been counteracted. In particular that which has not been reversed since.
The institution of this Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) is something that is only in use by the senior Scientology organization known as the Sea Organization (Sea Org*). These persons assigned to this RPF were considered to have failed the group, and it is said that in this unit they have the opportunity to redeem themselves.
“REHABILITATION PROJECT FORCE, brought into being in Div 4 FSO*. To it are assigned: (1) R/Sers* (2) low OCA* non-producers (3) repeated stat* crashers (4) overt product* makers. The stable datum for the unit and for its individual sections is one job, one place, one time. Its sub-products are completed cycles of action. The 5-hour daily study period for the RPF is devoted to tech. In this period, the RPF is to learn tech and get themselves handled in co-audit to fun clean-up and release. The RPF has been created by the Commodore so that redemption can occur. That is basically its only purpose. (FO 3434)”
(from 'Scientology Administrative Dictionary')
Reference materials and lists: (links will open as pop-up windows)
This is one of these things that has given Scientology and/or L. Ron Hubbard a rather bad reputation, usually it is briefly referred to as the ‘RPF’. It has been claimed that L. Ron Hubbard also would be the source of the establishment of this. The question is if this is actually true? In addition one should ask oneself the question if there is actually anything found in the writings or the subject of Scientology that would justify the existence of such an outfit as this RPF? How for example could it be reconciled with: “The motto is ‘Hat don't hit’.” and “I have concluded man cannot be trusted with justice.” LRH (from HCO PL 6 Oct 70 Issue III “Ethics Penalties”). That what this HCO PL relates is actually an interesting development as various penalty policies were being cancelled and an workable reason and explanation was given (more about this reference consult my study “Scientology: The ‘Fair Game Law’ - A detailed study”, see Scientology index page).
As a matter of fact the rules for the RPF claim that one of its purposes was to give the person the opportunity to redeem him/herself for supposed wrongdoings, at the same time as one received relevant auditing and a study program (hatting one could say). The problem however is that one could end up on this RPF a bit too easily. It is quite true that for some rather insignificant reason you could be send to this unit the RPF. There was also this frequent reoccurring habit to threaten persons with ethics handling or even to be send to RPF if one did not comply with some demand. This did not result in a particular pleasant working situation. It caused this shadow of constant pressure hanging over you. Some missionaire or some person from a senior organization could just come into the area doing some inspection, and then some things may start happening. Generally these persons did not have a very gentle way of going about this either. At least they did not make you feel appreciated. Agreed is that for example at the Flag Land Base (Clearwater, Fl) that there were particular expectations and much pressure was put on staff to service the public there. Especially at such places it appears more evident of some sword of Damocles floating over your head, and staff wondering when their head was going to roll. I am likely to exaggerate a bit here in the above, however a particular pressure was felt. I remember this, and it wasn't pleasant.
I recall an incident at Flag during the late 80's. We had this Word Clearer/Course Supervisor in the Staff College. Suddenly some day I saw her wearing black clothes and running around (those on the RPF were not allowed to actually walk, you stood either still or you run). It appeared that she had joined the ranks of this unit the RPF. Some week or so later she was back on post again. What had happened? There were some issues about that she had questioned the routine in the course room to clap and thank L. Ron Hubbard after each study period. She simply inquired what the reference was for doing so! (there does not exist such a reference by the way) And indeed for a such wishy-washy reason one could end up on this RPF. Anyway she was returned to post rapidly as the statistics had crashed in the Staff College after that she had been RPFed. Instances as these may however not have been so common during the time that I was there, but I recall this particular incident. Unwise RPF assignments apparently did occur. One could say that this confirms that “man cannot be trusted with justice.”. So then what called for or justified this RPF to actually come into existence? Or rather why was its existence prolonged after one had moved onto land? After all we were not at sea anywhere where a strict discipline was a necessity.
It will be hard to do an evaluation about this RPF unit without having access to the main issue that actually established it. I only have access to the 1977 revision and the 1997 rewrite of it. Although I would be interested in copies of the original 1974 release. If anyone can help me with that, then please contact me. (below link will open as a pop-up window)
In these rules found in FO 3434RB I actually don't see it mentioned that one was not allowed to actually normally walk while on the RPF. In fact you were not, I remember this very clearly from Flag. You saw them either standing or running. The Declaration of Anne Rosenblum lists a summary of the rules, I believe them to be correct.
This not walking we find phrased as follows in the later released 1997 RPF Series. “Must move quickly and run on the decks on Sea Org bases. ... Shuffling, half running and walking have no part in this. The RPF must be snap-and-pop in all its actions (which includes running) ... .” (from ‘FO 3434RE-23R’, 27 Mar 75
(Revised 2 July 1998) “RPF—Rights and Restrictions”)
Its origin (Rocks and Shoals, Mud Box Brigade & Rehabilitation Unit)
Frequently 3 supposed forerunners of the RPF are being referred to at various places out on the Internet. Usually represented rather unfavourably. I give a detailed overview of each of these in the below. Noted are also any misconceptions that have arisen about them.
Rocks and Shoals:
When L. Ron Hubbard founded the Sea Organization (Sea Org) on 12 August 1967 and went out to sea he adopted a variety of naval terms. In a Flag Order from 1967 he makes mention of Rocks and Shoals as follows: “in most Sea Organizations a list of penalties is called rocks and shoals and is read out to the crew at muster.” (from FO 87). It also appears to be an old military naval term for ‘Articles for the Government of the United States Navy’. Article 4 lists various punishments that may be inflicted on any person in the naval service. #10 of these says: “Or intentionally or willfully suffers any vessel of the Navy to be stranded, or run upon rocks or shoals, or improperly hazarded or maliciously or willfully injures any vessel of the Navy, or any part of her tackle, armament, or equipment, whereby the safety the vessel is hazarded or the lives of the crew exposed to danger.”. We can understand here the source of the term Rocks and Shoals and how it had come about in most sea organizations (referred is not to the Scientology Sea Org here).
In this Flag Order it simply used the expression to say: “The conditions are our rocks and shoals.” (from ‘FO 87’, 2 Sept 67 “Titles of Address (Add Etiquette)” as quoted in ‘Scientology Administrative Dictionary’). Referred is to the conditions related to ethics (see vocabulary at end of page). This is actually all that it says here.
Out on the Internet we then see this associated with as if the US Navy Rocks and Shoals (list of penalties) were in use like that on the Sea Organization vessel Apollo. It should be clear that FO 87 did not “established a list of ‘ethics conditions’ and penalties assigned to Sea Org members which was read aloud on the ship during muster”. Please note that it simply does not say that! The FO related about Titles of Address. Mind also the correct title of the FO 87, which is not “The Rocks and Shoals” as some refer to it! It appears confused with the Rocks and Shoals that is claimed to have been established with FO 3434 RPF Series issued 7 years later in 1974-80.
Thus the original FO 87 though did not establish any means of penalties for the Sea Org. It appears then that this got amended in 1976 for use in the RPF. August of that year saw the release of ‘FO 3434R-34’, 18 Aug 76 “RPF Rocks and Shoals”. An oddity may be that this reference actually adds to the confusion as it starts of with quoting from this FO 87, which –as we in the previous established– got nothing to do with actual penalties.
This Flag Order was in 1997 reissued as ‘FO 3434RE-24’, 18 Aug 76 (Revised 8 May 1997) “RPF Rocks and Shoals”. This reference relates:
“..., members of the RPF have found the simple use of running laps around their work site, or doing push-ups or sit-ups, to be an easy and effective means of maintaining discipline. This is their system of ‘Rocks and shoals’.”
This Flag Order then lists 15 misdemeanors such as “NONCOMPLIANCE”, “FALSE REPORT”, “MOVING SLOWLY, WALKING INSTEAD OF RUNNING”, “BACKFLASH”, “LATENESS”, etc. Each disciplined with either of the following:
“ONE LAP: This is about 1/8th of a mile (660 feet) in length and is run in a circular route.
ONE LONG LAP: This is between 1/8th and 1/4th of a mile (between 660 feet and 1320 feet) and is run in a circular route.
ONE BIG LAP: This is about 1/4th of a mile (1320 feet) and is run in a circular route.”
Please note that the penalty is just one lap for each violation.
The list follows with the following additional notice:
“Minor corrections on the spot can be done with ten or more push-ups or sit-ups right then and there and back to work. Anything which fits into the categories above are handled with laps.”
There are some witness accounts that relate about this:
Anne Rosenblum's Declaration (pre-1995) reports: “There is an F.O. 3434 series called ‘Rocks and Shoals.’ There are penalties one gets for anything they do wrong such as non compliance to an order, not calling a senior ‘Sir,’ walking instead of running, missing a spot on a mirror you were cleaning, etc. The penalties consist of doing so many laps, sit-ups or push-ups. The laps are running up and down the garage ramp.”.
Martin Ottmann's Affidavit (19 April 1996) says: “RPFers have to do hard physical labor the whole day. Any order a RPFer has received by his senior he has to fulfill. In case he would ‘backflash’, the Flag Order 87 ‘Rocks and Shoals’, 2 September 1967, would be applied by his senior: The RPFer has to run around the next building, until he had ‘boiled off’.”.
The reference made to FO 87 in the second account is thus incorrect. It even got the title of the reference wrong. Penalties as described here above were not in use until 1976 with ‘FO 3434R-34’, 18 Aug 76 “RPF Rocks and Shoals”.
We find on the Internet various further accounts that report incidences of “running around a pole for hours” (15 hours or days) and all this in a hot burning sun. It should be obvious here that this actually violates the actual rules established in 1976 with aforementioned Flag Order. Nonetheless a steady referral is made to exactly these Flag Orders as if they would promote such a treatment.
Mud Box Brigade:
Mud Boxes are referred to as “those areas in the bilge which collect the mud out of the bilge water. Bilges means the inside bottom of the vessel where water collects.” (from OOD's* 29 Sept 71). Persons who were caught “loafing on post and drifting with the wind” and “invisible on post, and really goofing up on one's job” were appointed to “clean mud boxes, fuel lines, water lines, bilges, etc.” (from OOD's 4 jan 68 & ‘FO 1701’, 5 Jan 69 “Mud Box Brigade”).
This Brigade may be at times referred to as some sort of forerunner of the RPF, but is that justified? I don't actually find anything insensible in this Brigade. After all you were at sea, not ashore.
Rehabilitation Unit:
This absorbed and cancelled the previous Mud Box Brigade. Those people that were either “removed or comm-eved* as ineffective or trouble” were send to this Unit. They were reviewed by the Examiner “for outnesses in (1) case (2) ethics (3) training (Scientology and Sea Org ship training) (4) knowledge of policy. He then makes specific recommendations which if followed will rehabilitate the individual as a highly effective and worthwhile Sea Org member. The unit is worked hard during the day on a rigorous schedule on jobs assigned by the Review Chief handling corrective areas and jobs needing remedy and repair. The unit itself is thus made into an effective ship's review team. It works on a one job, one time, one place formula completing each job before moving into the next. Each individual thus earns the right to the remedial services he or she will receive.” (from ‘FO 1848’, 3 Mar 69 “Rehabilitation Unit”).
Here indeed can we find some resemblances with the infamous and later developed RPF. Still that does not make them the same or necessarily a forerunner. There is also an explicit difference. We were at sea. One should also not forget that these were developed for life on a ship. Peoples life's could be depending on if some safety rule was not carried out properly. After all you are out there on sea, a place where safety is an issue of the highest order. Being ashore is quite a different matter. Why then was it found necessary to set forth the original initiative ashore? True is that the move ashore had not commenced as yet, however we are informed that plans for moving ashore may have started to take form as early as September 1973 (see my later chapter entitled: “Why ‘Flag Land Base’? (Sept 73-Nov 75)”).
“An objective of the DPF is to keep a recruit or non-producer out of vital FSO and FB lines until he can pull his weight and is valuable. The main objective is to furnish valuable SO members to the SO.”
(from ‘FSO 559’, 24 May 72 “Deck Project Force” as quoted in ‘Scientology Administrative Dictionary’). * FSO, Flag Service Org; FB, Flag Bureaux; SO, Sea Org; FSO, Flag Ship Order.
“At this point in Sea Org development, there are two categories of DPF members: new recruits and clinical. Clinical personnel include out-ethics cases, tiger types, persons who need extroverting from their environments, and the like. Not to put ethics in on these guys is very cruel indeed. Ethics is what is needed most; ethics and good 8-C*.”
(from ‘FO 3126’, 20 Feb 72 “Shipkeeping Series No. 1 - Duties of the DPF MAA*” as quoted in ‘Scientology Administrative Dictionary’)
Estates Project Force (EPF) was for ashore:
“People who are just coming into the org could also come in through an Estates Project Force. So there's an Estates Project Force. Category A are people who are just coming in and getting in their basics before you let them onto a post and then there's Category B; those who have had a chance and they're put back there until they're handled. Do not allow these Category B's back in on your lines before they are handled.” LRH (from Establishment Officer lecture #4“Evaluation and Handling of Personnel, Part II”, given on 2 Mar 72)
“An Estates Project Force is established in lieu of a deck project force. Such persons do grounds and buildings maintenance at any of the SO properties under the direction of the Estate Manager and supervised by an EPF MAA as assigned by the LRH Comm.”
(from ‘FO 3118R’, 4 Mar 72 “Continental Recruit Training” as quoted in ‘Scientology Administrative Dictionary’)
As time went by and the Flag staff went ashore in the mid-70's there was no need anymore to maintain the DPF in that respect. It is interesting to see that FO 3192 actually reflects this change:
‘FO 3192’, 16 Jun 72 “Deck Project Forces”
‘FO 3192R’, 16 Jun 72 (Revised 29 June 1977) “Estates Project Forces”
Authorship of FO 3434 and its subsequent series
A frequent and for all blunt claim made is: “The RPF was concocted and ordered into existence by L. Ron Hubbard.”. So how true and verifiable is this claim actually?
Referred is often to that this ‘Flag Order 3434’ (issued 7 Jan 74) that called into being this Rehabilitation Project Force made reference to that the Commodore, L. Ron Hubbard had created the RPF. Indeed this Flag Order does say: “The RPF has been created by the Commodore so that redemption can occur.” (see also ‘Scientology Admin(istrative) Dictionary*’). An easily uttered sentence. It fails to explain when or how this would have occurred. The 3rd revision from 30 May 77 however does make mention that it was ‘Approved by L. RON HUBBARD,
COMMODORE’ (no other notice is found regarding this in this Flag Order). This approval however may very well only affecting this particular revision of this FO. I have not been able to consult previous versions of the FO for this. If you have any such or other relating to RPF please contact me! The subsequent defining issues (about 60 or so: FO 3434-1, FO 3434-2 etc.) regarding RPF also (as far as I remember) witness of no direct involvement or authorship of L. Ron Hubbard in them anywhere. Reference however had been made at places to advices supposedly deriving from him, but the authenticity of these is nonetheless difficult to verify.
Other claims that I find being made are “Hubbard assigned people to the RPF personally and arbitrarily, and was
the only person who could arbitrarily remove people from the RPF.”. I am unable to get this actually confirmed by fact.
Then we have “From 1967-1969 Sea Org members, at Hubbard's whim, were ordered to the ‘Mud Box Brigade’ or to the bilges of the ship.”. This can also not positively be confirmed by fact, in addition this sounds to me not more than just an opinion.
And there is a claim made in regards to ‘CMO* ED 411’, 29 Aug 79 “Re: Cadet Org” that is claimed to contain the ‘Hubbard’ quote: “Make it known to the children that any act of vandalism, theft or out-ethics or any crime committed by a child will be immediately followed by placing that child on the RPF under severe restrictions.”. Indeed that is quite a claim. CMO ED's are not known to have been written by L. Ron Hubbard. Did the ED may be quote from L. Ron Hubbard, if so then what would be the source of that? These sources are not provided for and thus unconfirmed for their correctness nor authenticity.
The journalist Russell Miller while he was doing research for his critical book ‘The Bare-Faced Messiah’ (released 1986) conducted various interviews with people who had known L. Ron Hubbard at various times of his life. These were reportedly all taped. Later transcripts of a variety of these appear on the Internet as the “The Bare-Faced Messiah Interviews”. Ken Urquhart was one of those being interviewed. He says relating to the RPF: “The RPF came into existence while he was in his cabin after the accident [late '73 L. Ron Hubbard had a motor cycle accident]. A guy called Gary Watson, who was the port captain, sent in some kind of programme of action to the Commodore and the Commodore set up a unit to take care of rebellious people or those not fitting in. I set up the RPF but it became very much different from what I envisaged - which was a place where you could be removed from the stress and strains of bureaucracy, with some physical work every day to take their attention off themselves and in the other half of day they could audit each other on problems they had.” (from Interview with Ken Urquhart,
McLean, Virginia, Apr/May 86).
My response to “I set up the RPF but it became very much different from what I envisaged” is that when one goes through these regulations for the RPF as found in FO 3434, then what do you actually expect to happen? What I mean to say here is that if you have some foresight it would be fairly easy to envision what people would turn it into! In fact while going over this FO 3434, it sounds pretty rough and restrictive. I find the comment of Ken Urquhart rather ignorant in this respect.
An interesting additional note can be made with that it says in FO 3434RB: “These policies and regulations may only be put aside or amended or cancelled with the approval of the Commodore or of LRH Pers Comm.”. The LRH Pers Comm was Ken Urquhart. It appears that he then could work on this at his own authority without needing Commodore interference or approval.
It is noted that this FO 3434RB revision does indicated as if it would be ‘Approved by L. RON HUBBARD,
COMMODORE’. Ken Urquhart on the other hand is not indicated in the liner notes. We only find him in the composer initials at the bottom of the document as ‘KU’. It may be noteworthy why the actual compiler and originator of this reference is exempted from being mentioned by name or indicated even by his post in these liner notes and only appears with his initials! It would be worthwhile to find out how this is reflected in the original release from 1974 though. It would also not be the first time that a reference would get such an indication as if it would be approved by L. Ron Hubbard which in later years got denounced. An additional note may be that the FO 3434RB revision of 1977 notes as a last sentence: “NB: In the revision of 21 August 1976, the definitions of ‘Fully Cleaned-Up’ and ‘Released’ have been revised by LRH Pers Comm.”. The LRH Pers Comm being Ken Urquhart. It appears that it continued to be him that was involved in this reference also in the later revisions.
There is an irony present here. On one side we have those in the Scientology organization that are being criticized for accepting/believing the claims of the Church of Scientology for all the things that L. Ron Hubbard supposedly would have managed to achieve. On the other hand we have these same critics claiming that L. Ron Hubbard would have been responsible or had devised various when his actual involvement can not positively be proven by fact. Furthermore just that it says underneath some reference that L. Ron Hubbard either would have written something, had ordered it, or notes his approval, does not always necessarily mean that he actually did so. Various of my researches regarding this found on my site does actually confirm this.
There is this habit however from the mainstream Scientology critics to put all the blame on L. Ron Hubbard for all bad things that had happened. If I look around on the Internet I do get the impression that some appear outright delusional about some things in regards to this. Please, let us be little more sensible and investigative about these things!
An interesting review regarding this posted anonymously on a newsgroup on the Internet on 3 April 1998:
The schedule for the RPF is to be worked out in detail by the RPF MAA around 7 hours sleep, 5 hours study or auditing, 30 minutes for each meal, 30 minutes for personal hygiene, per day.”
(from ‘FO 3434RB’, 7 Jan 74 (Re-Revised 30 May 1977) “The Rehabilitation Project Force”)
Various report extraordinarily working hours and unreasonable conditions with very few hours of sleep for the RPF at the PAC base* during the late 70's, and even at later times. I do not know from personal observation how the RPF working conditions were like for example during these late 70's although the reports that I have reviewed are pretty much consistent. I do however know from personal observation that the RPF during the late 80's at Flag followed very strict working hours. I have actually worked side by side with the RPF. At the time I was involved in a Uniform Delivery Mission at the Flag Land Base, and we had al these trunks spread out in the auditorium at the Fort Harrison Hotel in Clearwater Fl. There was an event scheduled one evening, and all these trunks were in the way (there were hundreds of them). We put them up in big stacks against the walls. So we were working like that with the RPF as we had this time pressure because of the upcoming event. Then at some time (10 p.m. I think) the RPF Section Leader came up to us and said that their working time was over. We attempted to argue but that appeared useless, they left and so we (2 persons) had to finish the job working during half the night or so getting all these trunks stacked up against the walls. Then after the event we had to sort them out again, and make a new list of where each trunk was located, so that we could pull it when the particular staffmember came to try out his/her uniform. All this till the next event came around, and we had a couple of those while the Uniform Delivery Mission was ongoing. Later we moved all the trunks to another location (Hacienda Gardens) and established a Uniform Exchange Post. Various times we got help from the RPF, but not always as they were occupied some place else. They did however move the trunks to the Hacienda Gardens. In fact our Mission working hours and conditions while running it were far worse than the RPF's.
An interesting study about the RPF can be found at below link:
It seems though that conditions indeed are very strict at the PAC base and Scientology International (located in Los Angeles). They appear much lesser strict at for example Flag, and in Europe the conditions appear quite livable and reasonable. At Flag one still saw the RPFers running, at AOSH EU* in Copenhagen I actually could see them walking from time to time. With other words, the further you get away from the headquarters of the Scientology organization the less strict the rules appear abided to.
‘RPF’ versus ‘Sec Checking’
The basic reason about why one does wrong is said to be seated in our mind. Our socalled false purposes. There is this thing addressed as the Overt Motivator Sequence. Roughly this can be circumscribed as the calculation of having done something wrong, one is then ashamed and unwilling to take responsibility for it (keeps it hidden), but as a being wants to be good, therefore resorted is to get it justified by actually repeating the original wrong deed (this calculation is not necessarily made consciously). Either way this would indicate that man is basically good. Now, pulling these instances in auditing sessions is said to relieve the person of this burden he put on himself and eradicate its motivator to repeat and justify. As a process this can be referred to as Sec Checking auditing. Basically this is just running some lists of questions and you trace and note the reactions on this tool the E-Meter. The RPF required obviously this Sec Checking. One problem though as Sec Checking for these purposes was explicitly forbidden since 1968 and confirmed forbidden in 1970. References:
HCO PL 26 Aug 68 “Security Checks Abolished”
HCO PL 15 Nov 70 “Confessionals”
This got basically solved with the issuance of HCO PL 13 Nov 74 “HCO May Do Confessional Lists” (this actually cancelled specifically the 1968 HCO PL). Details about this consult my chapter entitled “‘False Purpose Rundown’ (FPRD) (Jun 84)”, see index of LRH Whereabouts study.
A final note
It appears fact that this assigning to the RPF frequently has been misused and obviously has been at times in the hands of the wrong persons. There are some instances recorded within the history of the Scientology organization that it had turned into a mad witch hunt. See my chapter entitled “Witch hunts during the late 70's and again during the early 80's”. Most affirmatively we can conclude that “man cannot be trusted with justice.”. We should have learned this datum already from the walk of man throughout history. Considering the subject and the aims of Scientology would it have been probable that L. Ron Hubbard would have set forth and created such an outfit as the RPF? It was simply destined to get misused.
The ‘Primary Rundown’ vs The incidence of a technical slip
(Apr 72-Aug 74)
The slip being that this action was allowed to go into OBLIVION.
HCOB 4 Apr 72 “Tech Div Primary Rundown” introduced this new action.
HCOB 13 Aug 72R (Corrected and Reissued 15 August 1972) “Fast Flow Training” established what was to be considered Fast Flow Training from there on out.
HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Issue II “Fast Flow Training Reinstated” acted against the value of the Primary Rundown and the in 1972 established definition of Fast Flow Training. That which this HCO PL set forth was never counteracted. This HCO PL was issued as if written by L. Ron Hubbard, which authorship already 2 years later officially was denounced.
I have gone into great detail about the whole history of this Primary Rundown (see Scientology index page). All I do here in this little chapter here is make reference to some of the things that surfaced regarding the whereabouts of L. Ron Hubbard. Some indications can be pointed at in relation to this and what he was actually doing. In particular the following 2 sections found in my study raise questions directly in relation to his whereabouts or rather not about. Both links will open in separate windows.
Today the Primary Rundown seems to have been sort of replaced by the later released Key to Life (1981, public release: 1990), and possibly by the Standard Study Tech Drills (as part of the Golden Age of Tech evolution, 1996). Today the Primary Rundown is referred to as something that is announced to be released (since 1995, see any Grade Chart to date), which still has not occurred now 12 years later when I write this. My analysis of the Primary Rundown and anything that relates to it can be consulted here (link will open in separate window).
Either way the Primary Rundown dilemma and how it has been dealt with make for a rather strong case concerning the whereabouts of L. Ron Hubbard or in regards to what he was doing or rather not doing.
‘Saint Hill Special Briefing Course’ Checksheet (Jan 75) planned
The significance of GPM's in regards to the reactive mind dismissed (Jun 75)
“The basis of the reactive mind is the actual Goals Problem Masses (GPMs).” LRH (from HCOB 17 Oct 64 III “Clearing, Why It Works, How It Is Necessary”)
This is the matter of that an incomplete definition of the reactive mind had found its way to be included in that which was supposed to be a major technical dictionary: ‘Dianetics and Scientology: Technical Dictionary’ (Jun 75). Whereas it thus far was found fully defined in a minor dictionary: ‘Scientology Abridged Dictionary’ (1965). This latter publication was in use during 1965-80 in which time frame it was printed and reprinted 19 times (lastly in December 1980).
The following year it was then discontinued and accordingly we see the release of a replacement for this minor dictionary issued as ‘Basic Dictionary of Dianetics and Scientology’ (1981), and this has been in use ever since in various forms. The significance here is that GPM's had been removed from the definition of the reactive mind. In addition it had also removed the entry GPM itself. Thus this instance in time signifies that no complete definition of the reactive mind was found in any since then in use dictionary. Which is a shame considering the obvious importance of GPM's in regards to the reactive mind. In essence this could be considered being a technical degrade for reason that it is vital to have a proper and for all complete concept of what the reactive mind presents, this as early on as possible.
“REACTIVE MIND: That portion of a person's mind which works on a stimulus-response basis (given a certain stimulus, it gives a certain response) which is not under his volitional control and which exerts force and the power of command over his awareness, purposes, thoughts, body and actions. It consists of GPMs, Engrams, Secondaries and Locks.”
“GPM: Means Goals Problem Mass. A GPM is composed of mental masses and significances which have an exact pattern, unvarying from person to person, whose significances dictate a certain type of behaviour and whose masses, when pulled in on the individual, cause psychosomatic effects, such as illness, pains or feelings of heaviness and tiredness.” (both quotations from ‘Scientology Abridged Dictionary’ (in use 1965-80))
A detailed study of this can be consulted in below link: (will open in separate window)
Why ‘Flag Land Base’? or The move ashore (Sept 73-Nov 75)
(Includes: ‘Playing Dirty’ & A ‘sea captain’ turning to ‘musician’?)
In February 1966 L. Ron Hubbard had gone for a trip. He relates about this on a lecture he gave on 19 July 1966 (SHSBC #69, renumbered 1991 #432 “About Rhodesia”). All had been going well, the first Clear had just been confirmed, the various Scientology organizations were running fine. “I didn't have a very well conceived plan about it, but actually what I wanted to do was to find and found and locate an alternate base or OT base.” LRH. Things did not work out all that profitable in this Rhodesia trip (see the lecture for details). We see then the following year that the Sea Organization (Sea Org) got founded on 12 August 1967. Then Ron's Journal 67 (recorded 20 Sept 67) was released, this was basically a briefing addressed to all staff and students of Scientology organizations. It tells about the Sea Org and that its personnel are OT's. “Its mission is to bring Clears through the upper levels safely and certainly and with speed, and it also has the mission of getting in ethics on earth. It would be quite impossible to bring in a totality of Scientology technology without first bringing in ethics.” LRH. This was also the outcome of his trip in Rhodesia in the previous year. He relates further in this briefing about his struggles with OT III. Then he says: “I formed the Sea Organization of OTs in order to have an area where a Scientologist could come, who could safely then walk through this last wall of fire.” LRH. So this was the purpose of the ship, to provide for this safe environment. Where no agency could observe his work from the neighbourhood, where no government could send any police or such. On 27 December 1967 then the first Advanced Organization offering these advanced levels was established aboard the vessel the Royal Scotman (later rechristened Apollo).
“Ron present during the transfer from ship to shore” (late 1975) ('Source 29’, [ca Oct 80])
After having been at sea since 1967 on the Flag ship named Apollo preparations for a move ashore may have been ongoing since the establishment of the Flag Service Org in September 1973. The place that was finally picked was Clearwater, Fl. The exact location was the Fort Harrison Hotel which building was purchased. Reason that was given for this choice: “The Fort Harrison Hotel was chosen after over a dozen other sites in other parts of the US and Florida were considered due to its facilities, its size, its location near an International Airport, and its good year round weather.” (from ‘USB* ED 23-1RA’, 8 Mar 76 “The Fort Harrison Hotel”). An interesting question to ask though is why Flag –which thus far has had its base at sea– decided to find a location on land! After all out there at sea you are reasonably safe, you are international, and before all you are mobile. In fact at the release of OT III in 1967 it was found necessary to create a safe place. L. Ron Hubbard decided that at sea it should be for the earlier mentioned reasons. Was it found that the danger was over may be? Was it considered not necessary anymore to be at sea to proceed onto OT III? May be so, but probably not very likely. As at the time the organization was otherwise still pretty much under attack. A book written by Omar V. Garrison: ‘The Hidden Story of Scientology’, first published in January 1974, and reprinted in May of that year, does relate about various that actually confirms that. So why then go ashore? The reason given for that move was the following:
“My plans are to bring you
a new environment
where you can experience
newfound stability
of case state
and increased OT abilities,
something I have wanted you
to have for a long time.
The best on the planet is
waiting for you at the new
FLAG BASE.
L. Ron Hubbard.
Founder.”
(from ‘Source, a monthly publication of the Flag Base’ (first unnumbered issue), [ca Nov 75])
This first issue of the new periodical ‘Source’ provides for a brief introduction of ‘The New Flag Land Base’, to consult click here (link will open as a pop-up window).
‘Source 29’, [ca Oct 80] tells us in an article entitled “A Short History of Flag”: “The Flag Service Org of today was actually formed on the Flagship Apollo in September 1973.”. This actually makes for a rather interesting time coincidence indeed as it is reported and confirmed that L. Ron Hubbard had returned that very month after having been completely out of reach for about anyone during a period of 10 months.
In below link the full article can be consulted: (link will open as a pop-up window)
It is also interesting to note here that as it appears there was a situation with this Flag Base thing already at the time. ‘USB ED 23-1RA’, 8 Mar 76 “The Fort Harrison Hotel” was issued for reason to clarify some matters: “Due to the inordinate amount of speculation and rumors over the past 3 months, the following information is issued to clarify for all the actual scene.”. It then goes into fair detail about various on 3 pages, the purpose of the Fort Harrison Hotel and so on. Noteworthy is that on the last page an advice was made in regards to the location of the person L. Ron Hubbard, it says: “There have been questions from members of the press and public as to the whereabouts of LRH. If you are approached, simply tell the truth, which is ‘I don't know’.”. Questions apparently had arisen in regards to this, which is rather interesting. Then, why was L. Ron Hubbard not in open view? Where was he? Not on the Flag Land Base as it appears. It is reported: “LRH, meanwhile, had not moved into the Flag Land Base, because of this attack scene going on down there at the time from the local Clearwater Mafia. He lived nearby, in a small town nearby, and then he moved to California with a small staff in 1976. Whereupon, he started writing the movies, the films, the tech films, and so on like that.” (source: Debrief Capt. Bill Robertson, dated May 82).
Now was it actually safe to go in land?
Ironically later in 1988 with the release of New OT VIII it obviously was found necessary (or for some reason) to be at sea once more. For that purpose “A ship has been purchased in order to safely deliver New OT VIII upon its release. ... She has been named: FREEWINDS.” (from ‘International Scientology News 10’, [early 87]). We see that it says “in order to safely deliver New OT VIII”. In land still not safe for everything then, but considered safe enough for OT III.
‘Playing Dirty’
Omar V. Garrison offers a different option in his book “Playing Dirty” (1980). He relates in its 4th chapter entitled “The ‘Mystery Ship’ Apollo” that since about 1969 rumours went around about supposed suspicious happenings that were occurring on the ship. One of them being related to drugs, another it being a CIA “spy ship” of some sort. The outcome of what he tells may indicate that various US government officials (Justice Department, Customs Services, etc.) purposely may have spread rumours, false reports and acted in such a way to get the ship banned from all the ports in the Caribbean. All this finally resulting in:
“There was nowhere left to go, except home. So the ship which had never delivered a cargo to any port more dangerous than music, fun and scores of young people with cameras and money, set sail once more for the Bahamas, and thence to Clearwater, Florida where crew and shipmates went ashore to
establish a land base for their Scientology movement.
In all the long and tragic history of the sea, it is unlikely that any ship or group of seafarers were ever banned from so many lands in so short a space of time.”
(last 2 paragraphs in chapter 4 of Omar V. Garrison's book “Playing Dirty” (1980)) (full chapter can be consulted
here, link will open as a pop-up window)
But, if the US government, the CIA, or whomever, made such efforts to get the vessel Apollo banned and unwelcome in the various ports. Then, could that have been a planned operation? As it is easier to infiltrate and get control while on land in the own domain than some being out there at sea. After all L. Ron Hubbard himself had gone to sea for a particular reason.
In essence this is actually contrary the reason proposed in ‘Technical Bulletins’ volume X: 1972-1976 (1991 release) where it says: “1975 By June of 1975, the many activities aboard the Apollo had outgrown available space. So without missing a beat in their work to clear the planet, the Flagship crew moved their operations ashore to Florida, USA, where they established the Flag land Base.”.
And as late as 2007: “Word of the famous L Rundowns lead to the worldwide demand for Flag services and this expansion precipitated the move to a land base in 1975.” (from Flag Land Base promo for L Rundowns, 2007).
A ‘sea captain’ turning to ‘musician’?
An additional plausible reason for going into land actually has been proposed. This reason would presuppose that it was not L. Ron Hubbard that had returned in September 1973. You see, L. Ron Hubbard was a sea captain, he could run a ship at sea. It is then possible that this other person was not, and being a captain at sea can not be learned in a short time. It is proposed that staying at sea was only possible by hiring another captain,
and that alone would have made the absense of the real L. Ron Hubbard quite obvious indeed! In particular
if the ship would have been in heavy waters and this other person would only have become sick or other,
instead of simply taking control over the ship.
We may have it confirmed that in fact this person that came back would have been a musician, or a singer. Starting from September 1973 this person assembled a musical group called Apollo Stars. In the liner notes of the record release it makes then mention of “his early days as a professional singer”. This record release was followed by various more musical releases. Be it noted that prior to 1973 there has never been any mention what so ever about L. Ron Hubbard being a singer or musician, there is simply no record of any such. Now, what about if a singer or musician would be a sea captain as well? Obiously this would not be so very probable. (more about the Apollo Stars in following chapter “Into artistry: Music (since 1973-74) and Cine (since 1976-78), and onward”, see section “Music: ‘The Apollo Stars’ (Sept 73 - 2nd half 74)”)
Into artistry: Music (since 1973-74) and Cine (since 1976-78), and onward
L. Ron Hubbard had been out of reach from about everyone since December 1972. The L. Ron Hubbard that returned mid-September 1973 showed obvious signs of artistry and his focus was suddenly put on music. Less and less HCOB's were being released since that time. Few lectures are given during 1973-75 (none of which were ever made available to the public), after which he permanently ceased to lecture in public. Between 1973-77 indeed we see very few technical references seeing the light. Even if some of the socalled technical achievements were announced as ‘The Technical Breakthrough of the Year’ so and so. Various of them were more Public Relation than of any significance.
The earliest mention about these Apollo Stars I found in an article published in The Auditor. It notes: “Over the past six months, L. Ron Hubbard has researched and experimented and made unprecedented breakthroughs in Music and Dance.”. This issue of The Auditor I can date to Feb-Mar 74, so this places us at about September 1973 when it all had commenced. It further informs that “In December of last year, Ron assembled a group of musicians from the Flagship crew to represent the Flagship in a local concert. From that point they progressed.”.
The article can be consulted in full here below: (link will open as a pop-up window)
“In 1973 L. Ron Hubbard developed an incredible new sound in music.
Aboard the famous ship Apollo he organized THE APOLLO TROUPE, a group of musicians. The major section of this group was and is THE APOLLO STARS.
Radio, TV and stage people have uniformly decreed that the Apollo Stars ARE a new and exciting sound in music. It is often repeated that the STARS are playing the music of the future.
Thunderously welcomed wherever they have appeared in the world, the Stars have received a multitude of standing ovations, awards, plaques, and keys to cities.
L. Ron Hubbard has continued to work with them closely.
The Stars are all professional musicians, many having played with big name bands and each is or is becoming a big name himself.
L. Ron Hubbard is an acknowledged professional in many fields.
His movie experience and his early days as a professional singer come again publicly to light in the brilliant presentation of the STARS.”
The Power of Source (Arbuckle-Ferreira) Summertime (George Gershwin)
SIDE 2
3. 4. 5.
We're Moving In (Hubbard-Ferreira) Johnny Comes Marching Home (Folksong) My Dear Portugal (Meu Querido Portugal)
(Hubbard-Marple-Ferreira)”
Only 2 songs note collaboration of L. Ron Hubbard.
It featured the groupmembers: (each appear on the backcover with a little photograph)
“Neil Sarfati
Wayne Marple
Luten Taylor
Charlie Rush
Bill Potter
Sax
Trumpet
Bass Trombone
Drums
Sax
Kenny Campleman
Tom Rodriguez
Craig Ferreira
Tamia Arbuckle
Russ Meadows
Flute Bongos Lead Guitar Bass Guitar/Guitar Flute/Bass Guitar”
If further listed:
“Guest artist: Congos
Guest singer:
Tony Strawn
Laurie Douglas”
And there was also:
“LRH Audio-Visio Assistant:
Dan Auerbach”
Advertisement notices for this vinyl record appear in the various Scientology magazines at its earliest during April 1974.
The record was as it stated, produced by L. Ron Hubbard. The liner notes did say: “In 1973 L. Ron Hubbard developed an incredible new sound in music.”. Although only 2 songs (of the 5) note his involvement which involvement he then also shared with others in these particular songs. The question is in what extend and what capacity did he develop this new sound? Also we should not forget that the liner notes further say: “The Stars are all professional musicians, many having played with big name bands and each is or is becoming a big name himself.”. These actual musicians as it appears have had their share of previous achievements in the musical field, I am however not aware of L. Ron Hubbard ever having been involved in ‘some big name band’ or any previous achievements, or having earned a “big name himself” in the musical domain. It claims further regarding L. Ron Hubbard: “his early days as a professional singer”, which until I read this in these liner notes was utterly unbeknownst to me! He is however not listed as singing on the record release, and not playing any instrument either. It is also a mystery to me how “his movie experience” had any relevance with to “come again publicly to light in the brilliant presentation of the STARS.”?
The liner notes I perceive as being rather odd. It doesn't add up to me. To me it sounds like boasting about various things that can not be substantiated by fact. Are these the usual promotional propaganda as many musical releases carry along with them? It must be so. Although I do not understand why this Scientology release needed to made subject to this in this same manner. Propaganda stunts are primarily pulled to persuade some to buy some product.
The entry in the book ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 release), in chapter 42: “Complete List of Books and Materials” at “1974” reads as follows: “In February, Mr. Hubbard formed a music and dance troupe aboard the Apollo to provide entertainment and goodwill at the ship's Spanish and Portuguese ports of call. He personally instructed the musicians and dancers in artistic presentation, music, composition, sound, arranging and recording. Much of the technology he taught them is now found in the HCO Bulletins of the Art Series, contained in the Technical Bulletins volumes.”. Art Series 1 is from 1965, #2 is from July 1973, #3 & #4 are from April 1974. Art Series 5-17 are of a much later date (1977-89). The titles of #1-4 are respectively: “Art”, “Art, More About”, “Stage Manners” & “Rhythm”. The only one's of these HCOB's actually falling in the correct time frame are then #3 & #4! Not so much “technology” is revealed in these, they count few pages. There appear however also to exist 9 lectures that L. Ron Hubbard gave to the Apollo Stars in 1974 concerning various artistic matters, consult list here (link will open as a pop-up window). The tapes however remain unavailable to the public till this day. They are listed in ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1978 release), then the 1992 release of the same for some reason has stricken them from the records.
The claim that L. Ron Hubbard would have instructed etc. these musicians strikes me as rather odd and presumptuous. These were professional musicians that had “played with big name bands” and here we have then L. Ron Hubbard instructing them how to go about music and related? L. Ron Hubbard that as far as I know and that what is recorded had no previous proven skills in the area of music! It is a fair question to ask, what did he learn from these musicians which ended up in these HCOB's opposed to that “He personally instructed the musicians and dancers”!
This book ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 release) makes no mention of the released vinyl record. The above quoted entry I have to assume is only noted because of the reference to the Art Series.
I do have a copy of this record so I have been able to listen to it. It could be circumscribed as progressive jazz-rock. It is fairly loud music and much is happening in the music most of the time. Is it a new sound of music? Not really, a variety of other groups at the time were experimenting with this kind of fusion during the early 70's, and even earlier than that. You can however definitely hear that these are professional musicians that are playing the instruments. The sound of ‘The Apollo Stars’ however was not for everyone. Nonetheless it is claimed on an order form inserted in ‘Advance! 23’, Apr-May 74 that this is “Music which reaches all generations, to carry its audience to exhilaration and far beyond into the sheer joy of life itself!” and “No sound so vital, so uplifting, communicative and rhythmic has ever been created before.” and “POWER OF SOURCE is, as acclaimed, the sound of the future, the sound the world has been awaiting. Its revitalization”.
Above quotations are also found in ‘Advance! 24’, [ca Jul-Aug 74], see page 3. It added there: “No sound so vital, so uplifting, communicative and rhythmic has ever been created before.”. I wonder who actually decided upon to publish and print this exaggerated promo.
It is quite noteworthy that this record has not been promoted nor offered for sale in the Church of Scientology since its initial release in 1974. The question is why not?
Interesting in this regards is that it says in the liner notes of a third musical release –‘The Road to Freedom’ (1986)–: “Mr. Hubbard already has two music albums to his credit as composer and lyricist.”. These releases are however not mentioned by name in these liner notes. These must be however this ‘The Apollo Stars’ record and the later released ‘Space Jazz’ (1982).
I am unclear about when the group ‘The Apollo Stars’ may have broken up. I do however find no mention of them anymore after 1974. Excepting only that the vinyl record (with illustration and all) was still available for sale as listed in ‘Scientology Publications Organization, International Catalogue No 4 (Autumn 1979)’ (page 49). Anyone out there have more details about their actual fate? Please contact me! Since the 90's or so ‘The Apollo Stars’ have been replaced with another musical group calling themselves ‘The Jive Aces’. The kind of music that they play in a sense is somewhat similar to what ‘The Apollo Stars’ played (jazz oriented), although it is not progressive anymore, and you can say adjusted their sound to a much more popular one and is obviously aiming at a broader general acceptance.
Today, and since the early 80's this musical release has been completely abandoned by the organization. Subsequently there is no CD-Rom release available.
‘Ron's Journal 28’ (1976)
This was a tape recorded message for each individual Church of Scientology for December 1976. It is 17½ minutes long. The music comes in during the first 4 minutes. Its musical arrangement and performance was done by some other person but was using L. Ron Hubbard's synthesizer. For a while I have thought that it was an arrangement and played by L. Ron Hubbard, and some other still may think it is. Well, it is not! Which is clarified by its introduction notices at the beginning of the tape. The problem is that these intro notices are at a very low volume compared to the rest of the tape, so you don't hear this very clearly. The musical arrangement sounds like someone playing around a bit with a synthesizer. I would judge it rather amateurish. I am not sure if this was on sale for the public, but it may have been at some point. Either way this is definitely very hard to acquire a copy of. The various older Scientology organizations however appear to have it, and may still play it in the org for public if the occasion is suitable.
‘Space Jazz’ (1982)
This was the next music related release which was meant to be a soundtrack created from a book. The book being the in the same year released ‘Battlefield Earth’. The involvement of L. Ron Hubbard was quite clearly stated as: “L. Ron Hubbard is the originator of Space Jazz and the composer and lyricist for the album.”.
Liner notes say amongst other: “SPACE JAZZ is a completely new musical sound destined to be hailed as the music of the future. ... Now the sound of the future has been established by L. Ron Hubbard, author of the blockbuster science fiction novel Battlefield Earth.”. Remember that the liner notes for ‘The Apollo Stars’ release also related to it being music for the future.
This record was modestly promoted at the time. Slogans were used like are also found on the liner notes of the record: “Read the Book! Hear the Music! A New Experience Awaits You!”. The usual phrases that end up in the promotion machinery. The music however wasn't for everybody's taste. It carried unusual experimental sounds and compositions.
‘The Road to Freedom’ (1986)
Released on 13 March 1986 at L. Ron Hubbard's birthday event. This was the third musical release attributed to L. Ron Hubbard. This time it was all-round for the popular taste. Liner notes say: “This album is L. Ron Hubbard's musical statement of what Scientology is really about!”. Each of the 10 songs listed on this record claim: “Music and lyrics by L. Ron Hubbard.”. The last song ‘Thank You For Listening’ uses the voice of L. Ron Hubbard. The voice is not singing, but rather just speaking (sound snippets here below). This release was heavily promoted. The title song became the way-maker.
Singing sequence 1(0:41)
Singing sequence 2 (0:23)
This is copyrighted by BPI Records, for this reason I only extracted the 2 singing sequences from this song that carry the voice of L. Ron Hubbard. As a matter of fact, as far as I know, these are the only existing and/or ever released pieces of singing attributed to L. Ron Hubbard.
Only one person was involved in every of these 3 musical releases (1974, 82 & 86), and this was Charlie Rush that played percussions and drums.
‘Mission Earth’ (1989)
The liner notes on the previous musical release ‘The Road to Freedom’ (1986) made mention that “A fourth album has been recorded and is scheduled for release later this year.”. I am fairly sure that this may have turned to be the ‘Mission Earth’ released in 1989, 3 years later. I am not aware of another musical release in this time span.
Liner notes of this release say: “Masterly performed by Edgar Winter, the songs on this album were written by L. Ron Hubbard, based on his ten volume, all-time best selling science fiction series, MISSION EARTH.”.
Cinematography: ‘The Secret of Flag Results’ (Dec 77) & ‘The Case He Couldn't Crack’ (autumn 78)
Prior to 1977 L. Ron Hubbard had been involved in writing screenplays and various. This was primarily during the 30's. Of the total of 10 of such plays that he wrote 4 of these made it into film:
1937:
The Secret of Treasure Island
The Adventures of the Mysterious Pilot
The Adventures of Wild Bill Hickock
The Spider Returns
Each of these were socalled cliffhanger serials of each 15 episodes of about 12-15 minutes. They were characterized by sustained suspense. Each episode ended with some life threatening scene which then would be disclosed in the next episode. All this to arouse interest from the public to return the following week to the cinema to see its conclusion. Such serials were popular and quite common during especially the 30's and 40's.
It is to be understood that all that L. Ron Hubbard did for these was writing the story or the screenplay. He was not in any way involved in its production or directing. The year 1977 marks a difference in this.
“The Secret of Flag Results is the first!
And more films are on the way! Source magazine has learned from informed sources that Uni-Media Productions has a new film in production, based on a brilliant screenplay by Ron, entitled The Case He Couldn't Crack. This new film will be feature length, approximately twice the length of Secret.
There are also introductory films, instructional films and much more in the plans.
Yes, we really are in the movie business!” (from 'Source 14', Feb/Mar 78)
The website of the Church of Scientology lists the following on their “Important Dates in Scientology” page: (source, last checked 2 Aug 2007)
Spring 1976
L. Ron Hubbard established Universal Media Productions in Clearwater, Florida, to produce Scientology films.
Fall 1977
Universal Media Productions was reorganized as Source Productions in La Quinta, California, to produce Scientology technical instructional Films.
And in ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 Edition) it says on page 507: “Approximately one hundred miles east of Los Angeles, at the desert community of La Quinta, Mr. Hubbard established a Scientology training film studio (Source Productions) in 1977. Under his personal direction, in an 8-month period, Source Productions produced a public Scientology information film and 7 technical instruction films to preserve the standard training and application of Scientology long into the future.”.
1977-78 saw the release of 2 motion pictures. The story and screenplay for the both of these were claimed by L. Ron Hubbard.
Film:
Produced:
Shooting time:
Released:
Runtime:
“The Secret of Flag Results”
May-Oct 77
8 weeks
9 December 1977
45 min.
“The Case He Couldn't Crack”
12 weeks
autumn 1978
90 min.
Per the book ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 release) this 1st film “The Secret of Flag Results” had been released on 9 December 1977. The various Scientology magazines however make no notice of it earlier than February 1978, at which time it introduced its second viewing. All who had not seen it previously were urged to go and see it. At this time we find various notices and reviews (see magazines Source, The Auditor and Advance).
The various Scientology magazines months in advance did announce that this 2nd film would be released in autumn 1978. However the magazines fail to report anything about its actual release or to give any reviews about how it had been received by the public. We did find a notice about the 1st film in ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 release), see chapter 42: “Complete List of Books and Materials”, it fails however to make any notice of this 2nd film. I am not sure why its mention is omitted? I do however have its actual release confirmed at set time (late 1978) this from various Scientology old-timers who viewed it back then.
The film “The Secret of Flag Results” has been abolished since. I have it reported that missions were send out (around 1982-83) to ensure that its showing was withdrawn and that the film cassettes got returned and destroyed. Reason for this evidently is that David Mayo is starring as the C/S, and he has since been expelled by the Church of Scientology. The “The Case He Couldn't Crack” was still shown at Flag during the late 80's at some event at the Fort Harrison Hotel in its auditorium at which time I got the opportunity to view it. At the time I did not know what I was watching or its early history. I was just there and I watched it. Announcement notices from 1978 ensured the public that it was a “gripping motion picture adventure” that should not be missed. I recall after having viewed it that I judged it amateurish done, and that it had a very unrealistic (unconvincing) and exaggerated plot. I had no preconceived ideas of any kind about this film, therefore how I perceived it is interesting. I probably should see it again some time though. The film by my knowledge has not been promoted or shown since. Although older Scientology organizations are likely to still have the cassettes for this 2nd film, and may even show it if requested.
Technical training and dissemination films (1978)
The book ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 release), chapter 42: “Complete List of Books and Materials” makes notice on page 769 for “1978”: “To give technical training a terrific boost in speed and accuracy, in 1978 LRH wrote scripts for three new technical training films and personally directed six such films. He also directed three new dissemination films to introduce people to Scientology and the Bridge to Total Freedom.”.
In the same book in chapter 35: “L. Ron Hubbard, A Chronicle” it says on page 634 for “1976-79”: “Ron moves to a southern California desert ranch in La Quinta and establishes, trains and supervises a film production unit. Over the following three years he writes not only a feature-length screenplay, Revolt in the Stars, but also the scripts for 33 Scientology instructional films.
During this same three-year period he also shoots, directs and promotes 7 films which are used in training Scientology counselors.”.
The periodical ‘Advance! 65’, [Jul-Aug 80] notes on page 13: “Soon to be released! THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE A spectacular original screenplay written, directed and photographed by L. Ron Hubbard”.
‘The Auditor 171 (US Edition)’, 1st half 81 notes: ‘LRH Tech Films Premiere at ASHO’ involving:
“‘How the E-Meter works’
‘Recognition and Identification of E-Meter Reads’ (starring Senior C/S International, David Mayo)
‘The Cycle of Communication’
‘Use a Doll in Auditing and TRs’
‘False TA’
‘The Auditor's Code’
‘PC Indicators’
‘PC Indicators Drill Film’”
‘The Auditor 173 (US Edition)’, [ca Jan 82] notes: “FLASH! The latest LRH Tech Film to be released—‘START, CHANGE, STOP’—has arrived and is being shown now at ASHO!”
Further notices in ‘What Is Scientology?’ (1992 release), chapter 42 note (see pages 774-80):
1983:
The Professional TR Course
(directed and narrated by L. Ron Hubbard)
1985:
The Tone Scale and the The Tone Scale Drill Film
(narrated by L. Ron Hubbard)
E-Meter Reads Drill Film
(produced by Golden Era Productions)
1986:
What Happened to These Civilizations?
(released on May 9, 1986)
1987:
The Story of Book One
(released by Golden Era Productions, 9 May 1987)
1988:
Dianetics: Evolution of a Science
no notices
The History of the E-Meter
(produced by Golden Era Productions)
Man, the Unfathomable
(narrated by L. Ron Hubbard,
music composed by L. Ron Hubbard)
The Married Couple
(produced by Golden Era Productions)
1989:
Assists
(produced by Golden Era Productions)
TRs in Life
(written and narrated by L. Ron Hubbard,
produced by Golden Era Productions)
1990:
Dianetics: The Dynamics of Life
(produced by Golden Era Productions)
Upper Indoc TRs
(released by Golden Era Productions)
One additional one that is not noted in the previous I found listed in the brochure ‘The Bridge 1991’ which is: “The Solo Auditor”.
This brochure ‘The Bridge 1991’ also lists a variety of Music Soundtracks from LRH Films that had been made available on cassette. There are:
“The Professional TR Course Music
Evolution of a Science Music
Man the Unfathomable Music
The Cycle of Communication Music
The Married Couple Music
How the E-Meter Works Music
The History of the E-Meter Music
TRs in Life Music
The Auditor's Code Music
The Dynamics of Life Music”
The Story of Book One Music
Entries from this same time period found in ‘The Fiction of L. Ron Hubbard’ (1994) by William J. Widder, “Plays and Screenplays” (see pages 216-17):
1977:
Revolt in the Stars
Full-length science fiction screenplay written in 1977. Unpublished. (note: page 32 of the Widder bibliography dates this to 1976)
1979:
Unnamed movie plot
Synopsis of a mystery-detective movie written in June 1979.
1981:
Ai! Pedrito!
Full-length comedy screenplay written in 1981. Unpublished.
A Very Strange Trip
Full-length time-travel comedy screenplay written in 1981. Unpublished.
Pricings for services are being interfered with (Sept 76-late 84)
The costs for services during this 9-year period basically skyrocketed. The year 1976 introduced a system of monthly raises initially at a 5% raise interval, and later at a 2% interval (with a few interruptions). It was promoted that these price increases were due to inflation. Much pressure was put on the public as waiting with payment till the next month would have increased the rates. This also lead to that the public was persuaded by registrars to buy their services this month as the following month it would be more expensive. Which actually violated:
“Merchandising by advertising that prices are going up soon is forbidden.” LRH
(from HCO PL 27 Apr 65 II “Price Engram”)
A further problem was that these raises did not stop. At least not until the rates had become sort of unaffordable for the common person. Which violates:
“(a)Cheap, broad services for everyone.
(b)Personal services at a much higher (but cheaper than any other field) price.” LRH (from HCO PL 23 Sept 64 “Policies: Dissemination
and Programs”)
As an example:
early 68-Oct 76
(set prices, 5% advance payment)
Apr 85-present
(stabilized pricings, IAS 20% discounts)
HGC Auditing
(12½ hours)
$625.00
(advance payment price: $617.50)
$5,300.00
(IAS price: $4,240)
Which is an increase of 687% (about 7 times as expensive). An increase that is not adequately justified with a supposed world inflation.
An additional problem is also that the function of the Advisory Council (AC), Executive Council (EC) & Financial Planning (FP) were by-passed. Which interfered with the solvency of the individual organization. As per HCO PL 26 Nov 65 “Financial Planning”: “handle the money and assets of an org so as to maintain outgo below income.” LRH. Decisions regarding these were not anymore made by the individual organization since the issuance of ‘LRH ED 284 Int’, 16 Sept 76 “The Solution to Inflation”.
A detailed study about these matters can be consulted at below link: (will open in separate window)
Surely enough this year can be justly refered to as a year of technical modifications. Practically what we can conclude however, after going over the changes, is that it turned around matters rather significantly.
It is ‘LRH ED 301 Int’, 17 Dec 78 “Ron's Journal 30” that calls it proudly “1978—The Year of Lightning Fast New Tech”. A 14-page long cascade pouring out and summarizing that what had changed and was new. By far the most significant ones of these innovations can easily be dated to July and September of that year.
During these few months some extensive changes were introduced and implemented that would affect the previously used technology considerably. They were also of such a nature that they affected eachother. The changes implemented in July caused the one's implemented in September, and even caused changes implemented 3 years later in 1981.
Summarizing this we have a package of related changes. But not enough with that, we also lost technology that had been in use thus far. The main and the most far reaching modifications are listed here below.
New technology:
♠
(1) ‘New Era Dianetics’ (NED) (Jul 78)
♠
Causing: (2) Change in the definition of Clear (Sept 78)
♠
Causing: (3) ‘New Era Dianetics for OT's’ (NOT's) (Sept 78)
♠
Causing: (4) First grades then Dianetics (Nov/Dec 81)
Introduced:
♠
Speculation about if one was Clear or not: a) Scientology grades V-VII required or not? (Sept 78);
b) Is any processing needed at all? (Sept 78) & c) Natural Clear? (Mar 79)
Being told if one was Clear, adjudicated by others (May 79)
Lost technology:
♥
‘Standard Dianetics’ (St Dn) (in use 1950-Jul 78)
Considered superfluous (only sparesomely in use since Sept 78, if at all):
♥
Scientology grades V-VA (Power), VI (R6EW) and VII (Clearing Course)
Further ramifications of these are rather significant, I address these in a study that can be consulted in the link here below: (will open in separate window)
Vocabulary: 8-C: 1.Control (Routine 8-Control). (HCOB 20 Aug 71 II) 2. Essentially and intimately the operation of making the physical body contact the environment. (5410CM08) 3. Name of a process. Also used to mean good control. (HCOB 23 Aug 65) AOLA:
‘Advanced Organization Los Angeles’: A Scientology organization which services higher level auditing & training, located in Los Angeles, USA. AOSH EU:
‘Advanced Organization Saint Hill Europe’: A Scientology organization which services higher level auditing & training, located in Copenhagen, Denmark. ASHO:
‘American Saint Hill Organization’. A higher level Scientology organization residing in Los Angeles. audit, auditing, auditor:
The application of Scientology processes and procedures to someone by a trained auditor (listener). The goal of the auditor is to make the receiver of the auditing look at incidents and reduce the mental charge which may lay upon them. The auditor may not evaluate and has to adhere to the Auditor's code. BTB: ‘Board Technical Bulletin’, these are the issues of the Boards of Directors of the Churches of Scientology. Issue-type for technical matters not written by L. Ron Hubbard. C/S:
‘Case Supervisor’. 1. That person in a Scientology Church who gives instructions regarding, and supervises the auditing of preclears. The abbreviation C/S can refer to the Case Supervisor or to the written instructions of a case supervisor depending on context. (BTB 12 Apr 72R) 2. The C/S is the case supervisor. He has to be an accomplished and properly certified auditor and a person trained additionally to supervise cases. The C/S is the auditor's “handler.” He tells the auditor what to do, corrects his tech, keeps the lines straight and keeps the auditor calm and willing and winning. The C/S is the pc's case director. His actions are done for the pc. (Dianetics Today, Bk. 3, p. 545) CMO:
‘Commodore's Messenger Org(anization)’. A senior Scientology organization.
Ethics Officer (EO, E/O): The activities of the Ethics Officer consist of isolating individuals who are stopping proper flows by pulling withholds with ethics technology and by removing as necessary potential trouble sources and suppressive individuals off org comm lines and by generally enforcing ethics codes. The purpose of the Ethics Officer is to help Ron clear orgs and the public if need be of entheta and enturbulation so that Scientology can be done. (HCO PL 11 May 65, Ethics Officer Hat) FB:
‘Flag Bureaux’. 1. The Flag Bureaux manages orgs. It does not just execute orders of others but initiates orders based on evaluation that directs orgs, handles situations and ensures continued growth. (CBO 435-3R) 2. The international management body of the SO with additional advisor and management activities. (HCO PL 9 Mar 72 1) 3. The external org taking care of the international and SO orgs over the world and planetary actions. (OODs 8 May 72) FO, Flag Order: This is the equivalent to a policy letter in the Sea Org [SO]. Contains policy and sea technical materials. They are numbered and dated. They do not decay, HCO PLs and FOs are both in effect on Sea Org orgs, ships, offices and bases. Black ink on white paper. Distribution to all Sea Org members. It is vital for SO units to have master files and quantity of FOs from which hats can be made up for SO personnel and courses. (HCO PL 24 Sept 70R) FSO:
‘Flag Service Organization’. Senior Scientology service organization located at Flag in Clearwater, Fl. HCO PL (Pol Ltr, P/L or PL):
‘Hubbard Communication Office Policy Letter’: since Jan 74 reserved for L. Ron Hubbard only, these address administrative issues. LRH:
An usual abbreviation for ‘L. Ron Hubbard’. LRH Pers Comm:
‘LRH Personal Communicator’. This person coordinates communications from all sources to LRH. The LRH Pers Comm has full control of the Household Unit and LRH Personal Pro and all equipment, vehicles, gear, material and spaces. Thus the hat breaks down into five functions: (1) coordinating and rerouting traffic so it will be handled, (2) logging, nudging and keeping track of LRH projects, (3) library and filing, (4) keeping Household Unit matters up to the mark and the personnel busy and accounted for, (5) setting up schedules and events and getting things coordinated for them. MAA:
‘Master at Arms’. Ethics Officer in the Sea Organization (senior Scientology organization). OCA, APA:
‘Oxford Capacity Analysis’. The OCA (Oxford Capacity Analysis) is the English version of the American Personality Analysis (APA). The OCA (or APA) consists of 200 questions. These 200 questions are divided up into series of 20 questions, each of which measures a single personality trait. Thus ten traits are measured in all. (HCO PL 3 Nov 70 II) OOD's:
‘Orders Of the Day’. A type of ship's “newspaper” containing an item from the Commodore, the daily schedule for that day, news and notices, as well as orders necessary to administration of the ship's business. A copy of the OODs is delivered every morning to each in-basket on the ship. It should be read each day carefully so that you keep informed of what is going on around the ship and in the various divisions. (FO 2674) org, orgs:
Abbreviation for ‘organization(s)’. OT (Operating Thetan): 1. Willing and knowing cause over life, thought, matter, energy, space and time. And that would of course be mind and that would of course be universe. (SH Spec 80, 6609C08) 2. An individual who could operate totally independently of his body whether he had one or didn't have one. He's now himself, he's not dependent on the universe around him. (SH Spec 66, 6509C09) 3. A being at cause over matter, energy, space, time, form and life. Operating comes from “able to operate without dependency on things” and thetan is the Greek letter theta (θ), which the Greeks used to represent “thought” or perhaps “spirit” to which an “n” is added to make a new noun in the modern style used to create words in engineering. (Book of Case Remedies, p. 10) overt, overt act:
A harmful act or a transgression against the moral code of a group. When a person does something that is contrary to the moral code he has agreed to, or when he omits to do something that he should have done per that moral code, he has committed an overt. An overt violates what was agreed upon. An overt can be intentional or unintentional. overt product:
These are called so because they are not in actual fact useful products but something no one wants and are overt acts in themselves-such as inedible biscuits or a “repair” that is just further breakage. (HCOB 10 May 72) PAC (base):
'Pacific Area Command (base)'. The former Cedars of Lebanon Hospital complex, a Hollywood landmark, will now serve as the Church's national seminary headquarters housing ASHO, AOLA (Advance Organization), Publications Organization, Los Angeles Class IV Organization, Guardian's Office, and Flag Operations Liaison Office. (from The Auditor 133, US Edition) May at times also be referred to as the Cedars Complex. preclear (pc): 1. A person who, through Scientology processing, is finding out more about himself and life. (The Phoenix Lectures, p. 20) 2. A spiritual being who is now on the road to becoming Clear, hence preclear. (HCOB 5 Apr 69) 3. One who is discovering things about himself and who is becoming clearer. (HCO PL 21 Aug 62) Abbr. pc. R/S, Rock Slam: 1. A crazy, irregular, unequal, jerky motion of the needle narrow as one inch or as wide as three inches, happening several times a second. (E-Meter Essentials p. 17). 2. As a meter representation, is the result of innumerable committed overts in a certain direction, and when you've got that certain direction isolated, that is to say the items against which the overts were committed isolated you then have of course a rock slam. (SH Spec 203, 6210C11)
Rock Slammer: It means it's somebody who gets a rock slam when you ask them: “Consider overts against Scn” and that broadens out of course against Ron, against the organization or against an auditor. (SH Spec 198, 6210C04) Sec Check:
Abbreviation for ‘Security Check’. SHSBC:
‘Saint Hill Special Briefing Course’: This is a course delivered by L. Ron Hubbard at Saint Hill, England during 1961-66 and comprising of 447 lectures, its result is an adept auditor and thorough know-how of Scientology itself. SO (Sea Org):
Abbreviation for ‘Sea Org(anization)’. This is the senior organization within Scientology that run the Advance Organizations and also see to it that Class IV organizations (lower level services) do function well. If needed they may send out missions to correct if things don't run smoothly. USB:
Short for ‘US Base’.