Introduction So what is this all about? Why do I give so much attention towards Dr. Kent Hovind concerning these matters? Well, the answer would be rather simple as Dr. Hovind as one of the few creationists DOES NOT COMPROMISE with that which is true for him. And while doing that he does not appear to suffer of fixation. Understanding still starts with understanding of self. Meaning that one should be able to criticize oneself and correct if one has been in error. Dr. Hovind actually adds perspective to matters. Few have been this effective and have created such a consternation on the subject. Particularly noteworthy is as well that Dr. Hovind has looked through the scam that is being played. And he openly speaks about it. I refer here to the phenomena of a New World Order (see Seminar #5). Man is simply being played with. Man is being lied to, and with authoritive permission. Dr. Hovind evidently HAS SOMETHING TO SAY, and he should not be silenced or discredited in ways as has been done and still is being done. Hence my initiative on these creation pages. Please do not confuse this with admiration or devotion from my part. Probably it is best cicumscribed as simple respect. Dr. Kent Hovind and his Creation Seminar
As a fifteen year veteran high school science teacher, his love for science sparked his interest in creation vs evolution. He saw the tremendous need for exposing evolution as a dangerous, religious world-view, and for arming Christians with scientific evidence that there are no contradictions between true science and the Bible. In response to these needs, shortly after finishing his Ph.D. in education, he began the full-time ministry of Creation Science Evangelism. Since its beginning in 1989, his ministry continues to grow as Dr. Hovind spoke over 700 times each year in public and private schools, churches, universities, and on radio and television broadcasts. His humerous, fast-paced, illustrated seminars provide documented evidence against the unscientific theory of evolution. Dr. Hovind's goal is to strengthen the faith of believers and to confound and convict evolutionists. He offers $250,000 to anyone with emperical evidence (scientific proof) of evolution. He lives in Pensacola, Florida with his wife and their three children. Some have gotten the impression that the host of this site is Dr. Hovind himself. Well, it is not, thus I am not Dr. Hovind. The initiative of putting out his seminars on-line in transcript form like I have done is however entirely my personal initiative. In my opinion Dr. Hovind has something to say to us. And you can only verify what he says by consulting what exactly he is saying. These transcripts are presented as they are! Michel march, 2005 Scientific Evidence Disproves Evolution Theory
Facts prove Universe is about 6,000 years old, not billions of years old. Let's imagine we are exploring an old gold mine, and we find a Casio Databank watch half buried in the mud on the floor of the mine. Suppose also that the correct time and date are displayed on the watch, and it is still running smoothly. Then imagine that I tell you the watch has been there for over 1,000 years. “That's impossible!” you say. “That watch could not have been there for 1,000 years, and I can prove it!” “How can you prove I'm wrong?” I say. “Well, for one thing, this mine was just dug 150 years ago,” you say. “Okay,” I admit, “you're right about the thousand years being too much, but the watch has been here for 150 years at least!” “No!” you say. “Casio didn't make the Databank watch until 12 years ago.” “All right,” I say. “The watch was dropped here 12 years ago then.” “Impossible!” you say. “The batteries only last five years on that watch, and it's still running. That proves it has been here less than five years.” While we still can't prove exactly when the watch was left there, you have logically limited the date to five years at the most. You have effectively proven that my initial statement about the watch being 1,000 years old is wrong. The larger numbers prove nothing in this debate. Even if I were to radiometric-date the mud or the plastic in the watch to try to prove that it is thousands of years old, my data would be meaningless. The same logic can be applied to finding the age of the earth. If several factors limit the earth's age to a few thousand years, the earth cannot be older than a few thousand years! Even if a few indicators seem to show a greater age for the earth, it takes only ONE fact to prove the earth is young. The Bible teaches that God created the universe approximately 6,000 years ago, ex nihilo (out of nothing) in six literal 24-hour days. Then, approximately 4,400 years ago, a worldwide flood destroyed the earth. This devastating, year-long flood was responsible for the sediment layers being deposited (the water was going and returning, Genesis 8:3-5). As the mountains rose and the ocean basins sank after the Flood (Psalm 104:5-8, Genesis 8:1), the waters rushed off the rising mountains into the new ocean basins. This rapid erosion through still soft, unprotected sediments formed the topography we still see today in places like the Grand Canyon. The uniformitarian assumption - that today's slow erosion rates that take place through solid rock are the same as has always been - is faulty logic and ignores catastrophes like the Flood (2 Peter 3:3-8 says that scoffers are “Willingly ignorant” of the Flood). Listed below are facts from various branches of science that limit the age of the universe (including earth) to a few thousand years. Though it cannot be scientifically proven exactly when the universe was created, the evidence more than suggests that it is not billions of years old. Evidence from Space
Evidence from Earth
Evidence from Biology
Evidence from History
Those who believe the earth is billions of years old will typically try to discredit one or two of these evidences and then mistakenly think that they have successfully proven the entire list wrong. This is not logical, of course. Each evidence stands independently, and it takes only ONE to prove the earth is young. The burden of proof is on the evolutionists. Many who support evolution are great at straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel. (Matthew 23:24) It is interesting to read the ramblings of Creation naysayers like Scott, Matson, Babinski, etc. as they try to disprove the evidence for a young universe. See how many times they use words like “we believe,” “perhaps,” “could have,” and so on. Evolutionists may need billions of years to make people believe a rock can turn into a rocket scientist, but that still wouldn't be enough time! For Further Reading:
|